The Grand
Design (2010) by Stephen Hawking and
Leonard Mlodinow
“We each exist for but a short time, and in that time explore but a
small part of the whole universe. But humans are a curious species. We wonder,
we seek answers. Living in this vast world that is by turns kind and cruel, and
gazing at the immense heavens above, people have always asked a multitude of
questions: How can we understand the
world in which we find ourselves? How does the universe behave? What is the
nature of reality? Where did all this come from? Did the universe need a
creator? Most of us do not spend most of our time worrying about these
questions, but almost all of us worry about them some of the time.”
Good introduction, and fair
questions. The last book I read by Hawking is A Brief History of Time which primarily deals with how did the
universe begin and what made its start possible, does time always flow forward,
is the universe unending or are there boundaries, are there other dimensions in
space, and what will happen when it all ends. In The Grand Design, Hawking (and Mlodinow) writes a sequel that tries to explore deeper questions such as the above quotation. Both authors explain
why, according to quantum theory, “the
cosmos does not have just a single existence, or history, but rather that every
possible history of the universe exists simultaneously.”
They question the
conventional concept of reality, posing instead a "model-dependent"
theory of reality (which I’m not so clear about). “We discuss how the laws of our particular universe are extraordinarily
finely tuned so as to allow for our existence and show why quantum theory
predicts the multiverse – the idea that ours is just one of many universes that
appeared spontaneously out of nothing, each with different laws of nature,”
explained Hawking. “And we assess
M-Theory, an explanation of the laws governing the multiverse, and the only
viable candidate for a complete ‘theory of everything’” (the unified theory
that Albert Einstein was looking for even on his deathbed).
I think one particularly
controversial claim that both authors wrote in this book is the idea that the
universe can be explained without God. “Why
is there something rather than nothing? Why do we exist? Why this particular
set of laws and not some other? Some would claim the answer to these questions
is that there is a God who chose to create the universe that way. It is
reasonable to ask who or what created the universe, but if the answer is God,
then the question has merely been deflected to that of who created God. In this
view, it is accepted that some entity exists that needs no creator, and that
entity is called God. This is known as the first-cause argument for the
existence of God. We claim, however, that it is possible to answer these questions
purely within the realm of science, and without invoking any divine beings.”
I say that the fact that
M-theory, the Theory of Everything, the unified theory Einstein was hoping to
find, cannot be found until today or ever will be, is because to understand the universe, we cannot
depend on physical evidence and observable experiments alone. The grand design comes from the Great Designer, the Living God. My interest in science and
theoretical physics especially, does not need me to ignore the existence of
God, but rather, because God is the grandiose Designer, I want to understand
the world (and remain curious) both in physical and spiritual perspectives.
[This book is for general
readers, but some terms and theories are so hard for me to understand. So I
need help. I watched Lawrence Krauss -
Physics Made Easy on YouTube and Discovery Channel Stephen Hawking’s Grand Design: Documentary. And to detox my mind
from the ‘denial’ of God, I listened and watched John Lennox, scientist, and
apologist, a counter-argument in God and
Stephen Hawking on YouTube]
THINK BIG.
START SMALL. GO DEEP.
No comments:
Post a Comment