Showing posts with label Martin Luther. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Luther. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Romans 1:17 The Righteous Shall Live by Faith (#LetterToTheRomans)


"The righteous shall live by faith"
 (Romans 1:17). When Martin Luther, the Reformer, read this verse before his conversion, he writes: "I did not love, yes, I hated the righteous God... I was angry with God." But after the Holy Spirit revealed to him its true meaning, he then said: "Here I felt that I was altogether born again and had entered paradise itself through open gates!" What happened? #ServeToLead #PreachTheWord #TheRighteousnessOfGod

To watch previous short studies of #LetterToTheRomans CLICK HERE  http://bit.ly/LegasiRomans 


FB Page
: https://facebook.com/LEGASI.tv/                        
Podcast: http://bit.ly/LegasiSpotify          
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/LEGASItv/      

THINK BIG. START SMALL. GO DEEP.

 

Best Blogger Tips

Saturday, January 23, 2021

We Must Obey God Rather Than Men

 

Peter (and the other apostles) was not being disrespectful to the religious leaders when he said this 👇 In fact, in 1 Peter 2:13-17, he encourages us to submit to authority and human government "for the Lord's sake." But when their rules go against the faith, it is undoubtful that we should obey God first and foremost rather than fear and bow to men. Be a good citizen, even more, be a better Christian. Where are men with godly conviction nowadays?

Martin Luther, defending himself against German princes and Roman Catholic priests, said, "My cause shall be commended to the Lord for He lives and reigns who preserved the three children* in the furnace of the Babylonian king. If He is unwilling to preserve me, my life is a small thing compared with Christ. Expect anything of me except flight or recantation. I will not flee, much less recant. So may the Lord Jesus strengthen me." He did not say "deliver me" or "make it easy for me" He said "strengthen me" And he concluded his response with the words, "Here I stand, I can do no other. So help me God" #ServeToLead #FearGodNotMen

FB Page: https://facebook.com/LEGASI.tv/                 
Podcast: https://anchor.fm/LEGASI.tv/             
YouTube: http://bit.ly/LEGASItv

THINK BIG. START SMALL. GO DEEP.

Best Blogger Tips

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Martin Luther on Justifying Faith


In this passage from The Freedom of a Christian, originally published in German in 1520, Martin Luther develops the idea that faith unites the believer to Christ, in much the same way as marriage unites a bride and bridegroom. The soul is thus made “single and free” from its sin on account of being married to Christ; Luther’s language here suggests the image of being “divorced from sin” in order to be “united with Christ.” Through this union, the believer shares in all Christ’s riches, while Christ swallows up the believer’s sin. The passage serves to emphasize that Luther sees faith as far more than intellectual assent to propositions. Faith establishes a living personal relationship between Christ and the believer.

[In the twelves place], faith does not merely mean that the soul realizes that the divine word is full of all grace, free and holy; it also unites the soul with Christ (voreynigt auch die seele mit Christo), as a bride is united with her bridegroom. From such a marriage, St. Paul says (Ephesians 5:31-32), it follows that Christ and the soul become one body, so that they hold all things in common, whether for better or worse. This means that what Christ possesses belongs to the believing soul; and what the soul possesses, belongs to Christ. Thus Christ possesses all good things and holiness; these now belong to the soul. The soul possesses lots of vices and sin; these now belong to Christ.

Here we have a happy exchange (froelich wechtzel) and struggle. Christ is God and a human being, who has never sinned and whose holiness is unconquerable, eternal and almighty. So he makes the sin of the believing soul his own through its wedding ring (braudtring), which is faith, and acts as if he had done it [i.e., sin] himself, so that sin could be swallowed up in him. For his unconquerable righteousness is too strong for all sin, so that it is made single and free (leding und frei) from all its sins on account of its pledge, that is its faith, and can turn to the eternal righteousness of its bridegroom, Christ. Now is not this is a happy business (ein froehliche wirtschafft)? Christ, the rich, noble, and holy bridegroom, takes in marriage this poor, contemptible and sinful little prostitute (das arm vorachte boetzes huerlein), takes away all her evil, and bestows all his goodness upon her! It is no longer possible for sin to overwhelm her, for she is now found in Christ and is swallowed up by him, so that she possesses a rich righteousness in her bridegroom.”

THINK BIG. START SMALL. GO DEEP.

References:
1) The Freedom of a Christian; in D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, vol.7 (Weimar: Bohlaus, 1897), 25.26-26.9.
2) The Christian Theology Reader, edited by Alister E. McGrath (Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1995), pp. 229-230


Best Blogger Tips

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Martin Luther's Discovery of the "Righteousness of God"


My favourite speech (quote) from Martin Luther

In the passage below, originally written in 1545, the year before his death, Luther reflects on his early life, and particularly a major theological difficulty which he experienced as a young man. What was “Good News” about the proclamation of the righteousness of God? For Luther, this could only mean the condemnation of sinners, himself included. Luther here relates how, after wrestling with the meaning of Romans 1:17, he finally came to understand the “righteousness of God (iustitia Dei)” in a different way, thus opening the door of his theological reformation. He writes,

“Meanwhile in that year [1519], I had returned to interpreting the Psalter again, confident that I was better equipped after I had expounded in the schools the letters of St. Paul to the Romans and the Galatians, and the letter to the Hebrews. I had certainly been overcome with a great desire to understand St. Paul in his letter to the Romans, but what had hindered me thus far was not any ‘coldness of the blood’ so much as that on phrase in the first chapter: ‘The righteousness of God is revealed in it.’ For I had hated the phrase ‘the righteousness of God’ which, according to the use and custom of all the doctors (I think what he means are the theologians), I had been taught to understand philosophically, in the sense of the formal or active righteousness (as they termed it), by which God is righteous, and punishes unrighteous sinners.

Although I lived an irreproachable life as a monk, I felt that I was a sinner with an uneasy conscience before God; nor was I able to believe that I had pleased him with my satisfaction. I did not love (in fact, I hated) that righteous God who punished sinners, if not with silent blasphemy, then certainly with great murmuring. I was angry with God, saying ‘As if it were not enough that miserable sinners should be eternally damned through original sin, with all kinds of misfortunes laid upon them by the Old Testament law, and yet God adds sorrow upon sorrow through the gospel, and even brings wrath and righteousness to bear through it!Thus I drove myself mad, with a desperate disturbed conscience, persistently pounding upon Paul in this passage, thirsting most ardently to know what he meant.

At last, God being merciful, as I meditated day and night on he connection of the words ‘the righteousness of God is revealed in it, as it is written: the righteous shall live by faith,’ I began to understand that ‘righteousness of God’ as that by which the righteous lives by the gift of God, namely by faith, and this sentence, ‘the righteousness of God is revealed,’ to refer to a passive righteousness, by which the merciful God justified us by faith, as it is written, ‘The righteous lives by faith.’ This immediately made me feel as though I had been born again, and as though I had entered through open gates into paradise itself. From that moment, the whole face of Scripture appeared to me in a different light. Afterwards, I ran through the Scriptures, as from memory, and found the same analogy in other phrases such as the ‘work of God’ (that which God works with us), the ‘power of God’ (by which makes us strong), the ‘wisdom of God’ (by which he makes us wise), the ‘strength of God’, the ‘salvation of God’ and the ‘glory of God.

And now, where I had once hated the phrase ‘the righteousness of God,’ so much I began to love and extol it as the sweetest of words, so that this passage in Paul became the very gate of paradise to me. Afterwards, I read Augustine, On the Spirit and the Letter, where I found that he too, beyond my expectation, interpreted ‘the righteousness of God’ in the same way – as that which God bestows upon us, when he justifies us. And although this is expressed somewhat imperfectly, and he does not explain everything about imputation clearly, it was nevertheless pleasing to find that he taught that the ‘righteousness of God’ is that, by which we are justified.”
[Source: Preface to the Latin Works (1545); D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, vol. 54 (Weimar: Bohlau, 1938), 185.12-186.21]

THINK BIG. START SMALL. GO DEEP.
Best Blogger Tips

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Jesus Talks about Fasting, the Bridegroom and New Wineskins (A Reflection on Mark 2:18-22)


On one occasion the followers of John the Baptist and the Pharisees were fasting.
Some people came to Jesus and asked him, ‘Why is it that the disciples of John the Baptist
and the disciples of the Pharisees fast, but yours do not?’” (Mark 2:18, GNB).

Jesus was offending the teachers of the Law by claiming that He have authority to forgive sins (2:9-10), He casually eat with sinners (2:16) and now He break the religious customs, namely – fasting (and later, Sabbath). Why Jesus doesn’t obey the rule? For some of us, this look like bad example.

We must understand that by the time of Jesus the discipline of fasting had developed into a compulsory, external and complicated ritual. In the Old Testament, fasting was officially instructed to take place on the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16) every year. But the Pharisees religiously fasted on Mondays and Thursdays throughout the year. They added the Law. And for your information, these days are to be market days in Jerusalem. I assume that they fast to show off. Hypocrites! That is why Jesus taught His disciples to fast quietly, with humble heart and in private (Matthew 6:16-18). So, was Jesus showing a bad example? Absolutely no!

Jesus answered, ‘Do you expect the guests at a wedding party to go without food?
Of course not! As long as the bridegroom is with them, they will not do that.
But the day will come when the bridegroom will be taken away from them,
 and then they will fast” (Mark 2:19-20, GNB).

From fasting to wedding, Jesus uses these everyday examples to illustrate His point. He is referring Himself as “the bridegroom” in the wedding ceremony. As long as He is here they don’t need to fast because the Messiah, the suffering Messiah (Isaiah 53), “who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29) was in the midst of them. Therefore, at least for His disciples, they don’t need to fast. They should rejoice! It is a time of feasting not fasting. “But the day will come” when Jesus will be taken away to die on the cross for them, and then “they will fast.” This is appropriate because fasting is an expression of sorrow. But I wonder; do the Pharisees understand His reply this way? No, maybe not. Perhaps the message for them is simply: “My disciples are different. They will surely fast once I am no more in their presence.

This interpretation about fasting is totally new to everyone. Does Jesus forbid it or command it? Both. He forbids external and legalistic approach to fasting. He commands purposeful and intentional fasting. Martin Luther, the reformer, writes: “It was not Christ’s intention to reject or despise fasting. It was his intention to restore proper fasting.” The Jewish Laws (at that time have become legalism) is like an old wineskin; and the Kingdom of God – its loving commands and lifestyles – is like new wineskin. And so Jesus continued,

No one uses a piece of new cloth to patch up and old coat, because the new patch will shrink and tear off some of the old cloth, making an even bigger hole. Nor does anyone pour new wine into used wineskins, because the wine and the skins will be ruined. Instead, new wine must be poured into fresh wineskins” (Mark 2:21-22, GNB).

The New is in the Old contained,
The Old is in the New explained.
The New is in the Old latent,
The Old is in the New patent.
This is the Kingdom of God under Christ.
THINK BIG. START SMALL. GO DEEP.
Best Blogger Tips

They Click it A lot. [Top 7 last 7 Days]