The Art of
Thinking Clearly (2013) by Rolf
Dobelli, 2nd Book Review
I have read this book
twice. The first was 4 years ago in 2016 (to read my first review, CLICK
HERE). I love this book so much for three main reasons: 1) It’s about
thinking; 2) I’m very interested in social psychology and decision-making; and
3) Each chapter is short, concise, and easy to read. It is about cognitive
biases, namely, systematic errors in thinking that occur when people are
processing and interpreting information in the world around them and affects
the decisions and judgments that they make. The bad news is that all of us -
even the most self-aware people - cannot avoid all of these biases. But the
good news is that we can begin to understand why we do what we do and by deliberate
practice - we can make better (not perfect) choices. Dobelli outlines 99
cognitive biases, let me share the top 3 biases, in my opinion, that we always make
in our day-to-day thinking:
#1 Confirmation Bias. It is the idea that people seek out information and
data that confirms their pre-existing ideas. They tend to ignore contrary
information. This can be a very dangerous cognitive bias in business and
especially, religion. Let say you just started a business selling Faith Fleur hair serum because your
friend says it’s an excellent and the best serum in Malaysia. You post some
testimonial pictures on your social media and then a few hours later, you observe
(due to the algorithm) that others in your circle of social media also sell the product with very positive testimonies. You thought, “This product is the best!” Is it the best? No. There are other products in the market. Faith Fleur hair
serum is a popular, safe, and good product but not the very best there is. Your
friend says it’s the best, you believe her, and so you interpret everything
based on that existing belief or conviction. As you can see, if you apply that
bias in religion, it can be misleading, even dangerous. “The confirmation bias,” writes Dobelli, “is the mother of all misconceptions.”
#2 Groupthink. It is a phenomenon that occurs when a group of individuals reaches a
consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the consequences or
alternatives. Let me give an example in a Christian setting: during a Bible Study
on the Book of Romans, the leader expounds the Scripture and concludes that
Calvinist doctrines of predestination and election are the most biblical and
faithful to the Scripture. When you heard it, you’re skeptical and doubtful. You
wanted to respond and ask questions but since almost everyone nodded in
agreement, you keep silent. Not wanting you cause division, you suppressed
your opinions, and say to yourself, “Oh
well, since nobody disagree with him, maybe I’m wrong.” And you say “Amen” all the way. If you want to decide
with your friends where to eat for supper (Malaysian culture ma), then
subjecting yourself to groupthink is harmless. But when it involves ethics or
morals (and eternal consequences), groupthink can be disastrous.
#3 Halo Effect.
Simply put: it is when one trait of a person or thing is used to make an
overall judgment of that person or thing. It is also known as the "physical attractiveness stereotype"
or the "what is beautiful is a 'good'
principle." I love this example by Dobelli: “Dozens of studies have shown that we automatically regard good-looking
people are more pleasant, honest, and intelligent. Attractive people also have
it easier in their professional lives - and that has nothing to do with the
myth of women ‘sleeping their way to the top.’ The effect can even be detected
in schools, where teachers unconsciously give good-looking students better
grades.” Men, do you accept Facebook friend requests by a stunningly
beautiful girl right away even though you never knew her before? Woman, do you
think all the BTS members are angels from heaven? (Okay, maybe not all men or
women like that). We love to think that we are fair and just, not stereotyping
and anti-racism, very kind, and ‘never judge
a book by its cover’ but on a subconscious level, we do. We are irrational.
Why do anime fans think that Son Goku is the good guy? Because when he died, he has
a halo and angel’s wings. Oh, the halo effect dies hard.
I recommend this book for
beginners and for those who want to get the big picture of cognitive biases or
fallacies. If you want to study deeper, I recommend reading books by Daniel
Kahneman’s Thinking, Fast and Slow
(haven’t finished it, so no book review yet), Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s The Black Swan (use it as reference), Robert
Cialdini’s Influence (my review, CLICK
HERE), Dan Ariely’s Predictably
Irrational & The Upside of Irrationality (my review, CLICK
HERE), and Steven D. Levitt’s Think
Like a Freak (my review, CLICK
HERE). But before I finished, I’m fully aware of the controversy that Rolf
Dobelli is accused of - or actually, showing that - plagiarizing other authors especially
his once a good friend, Nassim Nicholas Taleb... I think it’s true.
#1Book1Week #ServeToLead #LeadersAreReaders
#LetsMakeReadingCoolAgain #TheArtOfThinkingClearly #SocialPsychology
#CognitiveBiases
FB Page: https://facebook.com/LEGASI.tv/
Podcast: https://anchor.fm/LEGASI.tv/
Instagram: https://instagram.com/legasi.tv/
YouTube: http://bit.ly/LEGASItv
THINK BIG.
START SMALL. GO DEEP.
No comments:
Post a Comment